I read in the irish Independent this morning that the Irish Govt has appointed an “Internet Czar” – someone to keep us all safe on the Internet.
John Laffan is due to take up his role as the director of the Office for Internet Safety (OIS) next month.
Justice Minister Brian Lenihan said that Mr Laffan would help to develop programmes and policies designed to make the internet a safer place.
Phew! I feel so relieved now.
In fairness to the Government, people often criticise them for a lack of foresight and for not planning ahead. In this case, with Ireland having one of the most expensive, slowest and lowest uptake of broadband in the OECD the government is obviously planning for a time when the Irish people have Internet access.
Good on them, I say. But wait, this is yet another position with no authority:
Although it will have no power to fine internet service providers, Mr Lenihan said that he would not hesitate to provide the OIS with “legislative teeth” if necessary.
Why bother create the position, if it is a powerless one? What a waste. Again.
Never mind the health system, or the total lack of any investment in ICT in education (or the total lack of investment in education), as long as Bertie stops the tribunals asking searching questions and we have an Internet Czar, all will be well in the world.
With any luck they will soon appoint a Book Czar to make books safe for us too. Some people like that awful Roddy Doyle use terrible language in their books. And what about a People Czar? Don’t the government know that all over the world there are people walking around completely naked under their clothes?
We need to keep the children safe.
What cretin came up with this silly idea?
I’m on a 3mb dsl connection. And that is one of the faster connections it is possible to get in this country! That costs me â‚¬40 per month plus 21% vat.
In the report that Sean links to we see that
The cost [of broadband] in all of the top 10 countries averages less than $5 per month/megabit.
$5 per mb per month – that’s less than â‚¬4 per mb per month. I’m paying over â‚¬13 per mb per month (not including vat) and even then, I can only get 3mb. If I want any more than that I need all six numbers in the lotto.
Ireland is an island nation – it looks like the current administration are determined to see that we remain cut off from the rest of the world, the modern equivalent of De Valera‘s isolationist policies.
Getting broadband from your mobile operator is a very tempting proposition as I have mentioned previously. It allows you to finally get rid of that landline you so rarely use (and pay a fortune in monthly charges for) and mobile broadband means you can take it with you when you travel – no more looking for wifi hotspots.
However, reading FrankP’s experience with 3 Ireland’s mobile broadband offering I think I’ll hold off on going the 3 Ireland route for mobile broadband for now.
I spoke to Frank this morning after reading his post and I asked him about the speed of the connection – he said:
1288 kbps right now
yesterday it was 504 kbps when I checked
10th it was 612 kbps / 1141
9th 334 kbps
8th from 30 to 70kbps
This is quite a bit different from the promise on the 3 Ireland Broadband page:
speeds of up to 3.6Mbps â€“ smooth surfing guaranteed
Is Frank’s experience with 3 Ireland unique or have others had similar issues?
Paul Giltenan of Choice Communications has promised me a review O2 broadband modem to trial so I’m looking forward to seeing how that works. I wonder are O2 customers having similar problems – they are, after all, using the same Huawei usb modem.
Several of the Irish mobile operators now have mobile broadband offerings and the offerings are getting more and more compelling!
All the operators are using the same Huawei external USB mobile broadband modem. O2 claim that unlike their competitors, their version will have drivers for Windows Vista when they launch.
The data for O2 is speculative as their offering won’t be officially launched until July 2nd but their roadmap, according to O2 spokesman Kevin Heffernan, is to ramp from an initial 3.6Mbps to 7.2Mbps by year end and then 14.4Mbps next year! Also, initially they were to roll out with a 6Gb download cap but it is now looking increasingly likely that this will be revised up to 10Gb.
O2 are saying that they are positioning this to compete with similar offerings from Vodafone and 3Ireland but if I compare these figures to my current Eircom DSL broadband connection, it is: 3mb, â‚¬40 per month (ex VAT), and a 40GB download cap. The biggest difference between the two is the download but I don’t download that much so that shouldn’t be an issue.
As I see it, the O2 mobile broadband product could easily start to replace DSL connections either for home users or for Solo Soho setups. The mobile broadband obviously has the advantage of being mobile so you can take it on the train, for example and work away while traveling! And with Ireland having the most expensive line rentals in Europe (â‚¬9 per month more than the EU average), this is one more nail in the coffin of fixed lines here.
O2 are also rolling out an EDGE network which should be fully rolled out by q1 2008 according to Heffernan. This means wherever the 3.6Gb HSDPA (or 7.2 or 14.4) is unavailable, the modem should fall back to EDGE’s semi-respectable 256kb. This is at least twice as fast as GPRS.
Finally, starting in 2008, O2 will start on building a HSDUA network – this will give upload speeds of 14.4 Mbps eventually!
Are DSL’s days numbered in Ireland
Further to my last post on the pitiful state of broadband in Ireland – believe it or not, it gets worse!
The wholesale cost of broadband is roughly three times more expensive in Cork than it is in Dublin.
Wholesale bandwidth in Dublin is available for â‚¬25.00 per MBit/month. In itself a ridiculously expensive price.
However, backhaul costs to Dublin from Cork for a 50MBit pipe would add another â‚¬50 per MBit/month. So wholesale bandwidth in Cork ends up being â‚¬75.00 per MBit/month or put another way it is three times dearer in Cork than Dublin!
How is Cork supposed to compete with Dublin on a cost basis when the basic infrastructure is prohibitively expensive?
What would have happened to Cork 100 years ago if the telephone service was three times more expensive in Cork as opposed to Dublin?
ForfÃ¡s* released a damning report on the state of broadband in Ireland on 30th November 2006. Remember, ForfÃ¡s is an Irish governmental agency operating under the auspices of the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment.
The report is 34 pages in PDF format. Let me summarise some of the main findings for you:
The report found that:
In 2005, the European Commission estimated that DSL coverage in Ireland based on population stood at 72%, making it the second lowest of the EU-15 countries. Rural DSL availability was just 38% of the population
In this graph you can see the poor uptake of broadband in Ireland – Ireland (in green near the bottom) ranks 21st out of 24 EU countries surveyed, slightly ahead of Slovakia and Cyprus.
One of the principal reasons for this, according to the ForfÃ¡s report is the unbelievably slow rate of Local Loop Unbundling (LLU) in Ireland as the incumbent telecom (Eircom) aided and abetted by its partner Comreg the does everything in its power to thwart any attempts to unbundle.
Eircom’s desire to stop LLU, I can understand, but you have to wonder what are the motivations of Comreg and Noel Dempsey for perpetuating this state of affairs. They are supposed to be working in the interests of the Irish people. I can only guess what promises have been made to whom.
Ireland’s national policy and advisory board for enterprise, trade, science, technology and innovation
However bad things are in Ireland in relation to our broadband speeds – things are even worse in Iran. According to the Guardian, the government there has ordered all ISPs to limit Internet speeds to 128kb. This is in an effort to:
make it more difficult to download foreign music, films and television programmes, which the authorities blame for undermining Islamic culture among the younger generation. It will also impede efforts by political opposition groups to organise by uploading information on to the net.
Iran also has some of the most stringent filters blocking Internet sites into the country – almost as bad as China’s infamous Great Firewall of China.
Having said that, I know several people in Ireland who’d love if they could get speeds of 128kb ‘cos they are stuck with 44kb dialup.
If Iran is really serious about reducing the speeds of access for its citizens, I suggest they hire in the expertise of Ireland’s Minister for Broadband Suppression and Ireland’s Telecom’s Regulator Isolde Goggin who have successfully managed to keep Ireland at the bottom of the international broadband leagues for years now
I wrote a post not so long ago about the state of broadband worldwide and how poorly served we are in Ireland. I showed a table of broadband speeds and prices worldwide – based on the table the average broadband speed was 18mb for 44 US$ per month.
However, Lupan, a Japanese reader commented on the post correcting the figure for Japan. His broadband is 100mb for the equivalent of â‚¬25 per month!
Incredible, my own connection is 3mb for â‚¬50 per month and that’s good compared to many in Ireland.
If i lived in Japan I could get 33 times the speed for half the price I pay in Ireland.
Noel Dempsey, our minister for broadband suppression should take up thumb twiddling or some other pastime equally suited to his (in)abilities.
This is the face in incompetence in Ireland. This is the face of Ireland’s Minister for broadband suppression.
This is the face of the minister of communications in Ireland who has presided over Ireland’s languishing:
14th in the EU15 for broadband penetration. Thatâ€™s the same place we were in 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002 etc. etc.
Congratulations minister. Under-achievers everywhere bow down before you in awe.
[Update] – Just came across this great site about the minister.